Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc A380: These two entry-level desktop GPUs are targeted at budget gamers. Normally, none of these two GPUs make the list of our best graphics cards of 2022. But since you’ll have to choose one out of these two, which one should you go for?
In this comparison of Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc A380, we’ll pay attention to their specs, price and availability, and performance.
Price and Release Date
The Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU was released in the summer of 2022, and it will cost you $139. In comparison, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 desktop Card was released in April 2019. It is the most expensive here with a price tag of $199 even though it was launched three years ago.
Thus, the latest Intel Arc A380 is more price friendly. However, as far as this comparison is concerned, value is more important than affordability. You’ll get to understand this more as this comparison goes on.
For now, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 graphics card is widely available for purchase. You can use the box at the bottom of this post to purchase it. While the Intel Arc A380 graphics card is regional dependent. Although it has been available in China since the launch date. However, it recently arrived in the American market. So if you reside in the US, you can buy ASRock’s Challenger ITX Arc A380 desktop Graphics Card at Newegg.
The performance of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is slightly stronger than the Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU. And that seems to be a big deal especially when you realised that the Nvidia GTX 1650 graphics Card is a desktop GPU from over three years ago.
For most of the performance tests, the Intel Arc A380 was behind the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 by 17%. These two mid-range graphics cards are built to excel more in games at 1080p resolution. Even with ReBAR enabled, the Intel Arc A380 GPU continued to ramble behind the Nvidia entry-level Card of three years ago.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc A350: Verdict
The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the Intel Arc A350 desktop GPU. Even though the former was launched over three years ago and it’s slightly more expensive, it remains a better choice at the moment. As far as consumer desktop GPUs are concerned, Intel still has a lot of work to do and the company knows that.